Asked by the editor of the magazine Vital Signs to write a book review of Bruce Greyson’s After, I decided to share it here also, as a piece of glad tidings. On the personal level, my Reckoning: Discoveries after a Traumatic Near-Death Experience is now generally available in both paperback and ebook format. (If you hear that a bookstore does not have the ebook, there’s been a lag, but it is coming!) The next post here will be within two weeks.
And now, heeere’s After!
After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond
Bruce Greyson’s long-awaited book is out. Ken Ring calls it a “humdinger.” He’s right. I call it unparalleled, a book as foundational for the next generations of near-death studies as Raymond Moody’s Life After Life was to the first. It is certainly unparalleled as a basic read for anyone wanting reliable information about near-death experiences.
Greyson is personally an engaging man, and this book is a thoroughly engaging read. Conversational and full of personal experience, it moves right along, offering, for the first time, glimpses into his family life and growing up. The voice is thoroughly his own, warm and approachable yet always following his carefully restrained objectivity in the cause of balance. In a field occupied on one hand by strictly skeptical materialists and on the other by spiritual enthusiasts, others may speculate and theorize; he is occupied by a search for evidence.
Among the personal glimpses illuminating his distinctive contribution is a wonderful anecdote about Bruce and his father, whom he describes as a skeptic, “a chemist whose perception of reality was defined by the periodic table of the elements.” The anecdote describes a conversation during a visit home as a third-year med student.
I surprised my father with the news that I was thinking of becoming a psychiatrist. I told my father that I was fascinated by the effects our unconscious thoughts and feelings had on our behavior. Sitting in his easy chair with his legs crossed, my father slowly pulled a corncob pipe and tobacco pouch out of his jacket pocket. He meticulously filled the bowl of the pipe and tamped down the tobacco, then added some more and tamped it down again. Then he struck a wooden match and carefully waved it over the bowl as he drew gently on the pipestem. Finally, he looked up and, to my surprise, he asked, “What makes you think we have unconscious thoughts and feelings?”
I was shocked by this blunt challenge. But my father wasn’t saying that the unconscious didn’t exist. He was just asking for the evidence—as any skeptical scientist should…As surprised as I was…I realized that he had a point. I should look into the evidence of the unconscious before accepting it.
We see here the makings of a lifetime achievement. In fact, it is to a great extent Greyson’s unflappable quest for evidence which enabled IANDS–with which he has been so faithfully associated–to realistically describe itself as “the most reliable source of information” about NDEs.
A prime source of that reliability has been the evidence-based research of Bruce Greyson and his co-investigators, asking not only big questions but the myriad of small ones which matter, and which are the substance of After. There has been no shortage of writers contributing to the notion that near-death experiences are anything from weird to divine intrusion. Greyson is unquestionably a star among those who have made near-death experience credible.
One quality making this book stand out so satisfyingly is its breadth. Greyson is not, of course, the only significant NDE researcher and author, though he was among the first in this era. Other respected authors have routinely acknowledged research findings across the field and perhaps presented their own. The difference is that in reading After, a realization dawns, as question after question is answered across twenty chapter topics, that the findings are all emerging not from others but from the author’s own work; he is himself, sometimes in partnership but often singly, the source of so much of what we know. And this is key—that he does not flaunt that fact; it simply is.
Quantitatively, his output has been stunning: his cv tells the tale: Peer-reviewed professional journals have published more than one hundred of his near-death related articles and book reviews. (The public rarely hears of them because they are behind high pay walls of academic exclusivity). Another seventy are published letters and book chapters. He has presented at sixty-seven conferences around the world, including at the United Nations and the compound of the Dalai Lama.
Through it all, there is his sense of humor and his humanity. In Reckoning, I have recently told the story of the very early meeting of the IANDS Board of Directors, back when most academics were still at the very beginning of discovering how normal and paranormal co-exist. There was a good deal of “Can we believe this?” The high point of the three-day meeting was a demonstration of spoon-bending. The demonstration, using a large, heavy stainless steel serving spoon, was a resounding success, leaving Board members stupefied by what they had just seen with their own eyes. One outcome of the meeting could have been witnessed on a United Airline flight from Connecticut to D.C. There sat a man whom Ken Ring would forty years later describe as “the most distinguished and important authority of near-death experiences in the field,” patiently practicing spoon-bending with the airline’s plastic flatware. Bruce Greyson, pursuing evidence!
I predict you will be glad to read After. It’s a wonderful book.
Jill Whitehead says
Let’s hope we can communicate this phenomenon well enough for future generations.
Nan Bush says
Jill, so much of Bruce Greyson’s long career has involved his mentoring students in far-flung parts of the world. Now some good studies are going on with younger researchers, for example in Belgium, Germany, and New Zealand. Very hopeful!
Jill Whitehead says
I hope we’re included in these studies!
Nan Bush says
Jill, when you say you hope we’re included in these studies,” who is the “we”?
Jill Whitehead says
I was including those of us with mixed and distressing experiences.
Nan Bush says
Useful to remember that the term “distressing” for these experiences (rather than “negative”) came from Bruce Greyson. He neither denies nor ignores them. AFTER (his book) includes half a chapter on them. No worries about avoidance! It was he, alone among the academic researchers, who had the courage to do the first published study of dNDEs, and to invite me as co-author. Without him (and his MD), we would still be nowhere instead of merely down the scale. He’s a stalwart!
Jill Whitehead says
Nan,
I agree, Bruce Greyson has been amazing regarding this phenomenon. I especially enjoy his NDE Scale. It doesn’t quite fit for preverbal mixed experiences such as mine, but is close enough for me to measure what I’ve managed to integrate. Other than this, I liked believing I was alone regarding this phenomenon and have never felt like I was nowhere or down anyone’s scale.
Martin Z Jericho says
The spoon-bending exercise is a great example of something that greatly complicates belief for me; this problem is that NDE testimonials and their after-effects, and near-death research, sit so close to obvious charlatanery, hallucination and commercialized esotericism. Experiencers report abilities of mind-reading and seeing and communicating with spiritual beings, or predicting the future, but for each Experiencer who claims such abilities, there are a million charlatans who claim the same and have (to my knowledge) reliably failed to demonstrate it in a controlled setting. Likewise, people have OBEs under the effect of drugs, or due to other, more exotic interventions, and those usually fail to return any veracious observations. I guess my question is this: why does so much of the NDE and its aftereffects have a phenomenological correlate in shallow New Age spirituality? Why do so many Experiencers integrate their NDE into their life by turning to such kind of practices? Is there a qualitative difference between a non-Experiencer charlatan “medium” and an Experiencer claiming to be able to at-will call upon images of their deceased family members and converse with them?
Nan Bush says
Martin, sorry, my initial response disappeared entirely. You asked, ‘Why do so many Experiencers integrate their NDE into their life by turning to such kind of practices?’ I believe that for many experiencers, the ‘practices’ appear spontaneously on the person’s return to consciousness as an ability or awareness which was not previously present.
Similarly, the difference between a ‘non-experiencer charlatan’ and an experiencer claiming to encounter spirits is, I believe, whether they are pretending. It seems to me quite possible that those of us who do not report spirits are analagous to the color blind, who do not recognize colors which to others appear completely obvious. There are way too many instances of verifiable information transfer to dismiss mediumship entirely simply because it seems impossible; our disbelief is the weak link in that argument.